Parent vs. Coach: Complication

January 8, 2025 | By Eldad Campbell

Subject: Concerns Regarding My Children’s Tennis Progress

Dear Long Island Tennis Magazine,

I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out as a concerned parent of two children currently engaged in tennis, and I would like to share my observations regarding their training.

We have been working with their coach for three years, and initially, the relationship was very productive. However, I have noticed some minor complications emerging that warrant attention.

Firstly, it appears that my children’s progress has stagnated. While I understand that long-term improvement takes time, I have observed some changes in the coach’s attitude, including fluctuating energy levels and occasional tardiness to lessons. Additionally, I believe that the drill groups should be more appropriately matched to my children’s skill levels.

I also have concerns about the transparency of the coach regarding my children’s performance assessments and potential. The results in tournaments have not met our expectations, leading to considerable discouragement. Furthermore, I have been approached by other coaches, both within and outside of our current club, who are suggesting they could provide better guidance.

The conflicting information I receive from other parents and players has left me uncertain about how to proceed. I sense a lack of unity among the coaching staff, with some players appearing to receive preferential treatment. Given that my children are dedicating over seven hours per week to tennis, including private lessons and drills, I am eager to ensure they receive the support they need.

I would appreciate any guidance or advice on how to navigate this situation.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

A Concerned Parent

Complication is the fourth installment of our Parent vs. Coach (P vs.C) series. In the previous series, we probed the complexities surrounding the coach selection process, the importance of long-term commitment, and the dynamics of competition. P vs. C Complication will attempt to answer the troubles outlined in the fictional email above that can shatter the relationship between children, coaches, and parents.

As we unpack the issues presented in the mock e-mail above, it is critical to highlight that complications are a prerequisite for any successful endeavor. The email reveals dissensions within the tennis community, effectively introducing a moral quandary that spotlights the difficulty of navigating a path toward a successful resolution. This ethical dilemma is analogous to a three-body problem: coaches act on the instinct of self-preservation, as their livelihood depends on their positions;  parents are driven by self-interest and their child’s welfare, given the high cost of playing tennis; and the child tussles with a moral impasse, weighing accountability and honesty against the fear of jeopardizing influential relationships.

This narrative illuminates the thorny challenges children, coaches, and parents face when their ethical principles clash with self-preservation evocative of Socrates and Plato Buridan’s bridge plight, which examines the themes of ethics, decision-making, and the complexities of human behavior.

Providing specific strategies to the moral quagmire illustrated above would be irresponsible, as attainable solutions require a combination of pro-activity and reactivity when dealing with sensitive human emotions. Instead, we present four efficacious steps to decrease friction and foster a healthy resolution: self-reflection, open and candid conversation, decision-making, and trusting your instincts.

Self-reflection is tantamount to any conflict resolution agenda. It mandates a reevaluation of your initial sentiment toward the problem. As a paying customer, this reevaluation can be difficult, resulting in a default reaction to assign blame without the consideration that you or your child may have contributed to the circumstances. From the coach’s outlook, an overinflated belief in capabilities and qualifications paired with ego-driven tendency could cloud judgment, resulting in criticism toward the child and parent. It is critical to self-assess, reflect, take responsibility where warranted, and avoid the blame game. Question the hypotheses that led you to this juncture and reframe the problem, acknowledging your involvement.

Step two requires the immediate initiation of open and candid conversations following self-reflection. The conversation should begin with the coach working with your child, not external parties. Respect, understanding, and empathy, devoid of accusatory language that may prevent constructive dialogue, should be the cornerstone of the exchanges. It is also imperative that the coach feels empowered to speak freely despite the employee-employer dynamic. If healthy communication is unachievable, it may be time for the parent to consider finding a new coach. Likewise, the coach should discontinue working with the child if positive engagement is unattainable. Extended exposure to a complicated environment can cause damaging effects on your child’s long-term development.

Step three involves deciding the path forward. Having engaged in self-reflection, taken responsibility, and held an open conversation, a decision is a critical next step in the process. Each decision should aim to create a mutually advantageous outcome, ensuring both parties are satisfied with the suggested course of action. The agreed plan should be tailored to the interrelationships, as each complication stems from unique interactions within the agreement. An inability to arrive at an equitable resolution indicates that the partnership is not conducive to success. In such cases, termination may be the best option.

Lastly, trust your instincts. Decisions involving personal relationships, financial commitments, and a degree of ambiguity can create a value conflict, resulting in self-doubt. Trust your guts and confront the challenge directly. While it is difficult to specify a precise evaluative timeline to assess the effectiveness of the agreed-chosen path, a semester provides a suitable period to reflect on your satisfaction with the outcome. Additionally, ask yourself whether continuing on the current path will yield the desired effect and assess the progress made on the resolution journey. This approach will likely provide clarity in your choice.

Complications are bound to arise when developing and championing a tennis player. How we handle these complications dictates the future success or failure of the effort. As you attempt to solve problems, remember to treat others with respect. If both parties integrate faith and appreciation during interactions, overcoming difficulties and problematic events will become glorified symbols of your future triumphs. To our concerned parent above – what should you do? Question assumption, engage in dialogue, pursue virtue, seek knowledge, and trust your instincts. And remember, complications are part of the human experience.


Eldad Campbell
Eldad Campbell is the High Performance Talent Development Specialist at Robbie Wagner Tournament and Training Center. He is a four-time representative of the Jamaican Men’s Davis Cup, Junior Davis Cup, World Youth Cup, and Pan American Games team and a former number-one junior tennis player in Jamaica. He currently counsels high-performance tennis players, parents, and coaches, helping them navigate the different terrains of the tennis industry. He can be reached by email at connect@eldadcampbell.com.
Bethpage
Oneononedoubles banner art resize

Long Island Tennis Magazine March/April 2026